Performance Comparison Between Direct and External Modulation Using RZ and NRZ Coding
AbstractSuch as in any optical communication system, the light modulation is considered a main key to determine the performance (or the maximum) of the data rate that can be transmitted and over what the long distance can be applied. So, a choice of the modulation type in any optical link is more important and should base on measuring of the BER and the Q factor parameters. In that issue, we propose a comparative study as contribution between the principle or the schemes of the direct modulation (DM) and the external modulation (EM) respectively, which the chirp frequency modeling is described for the two modulations. However, the main issues addressed also in the simulation analysis when the amount of the chirp (in GHz) introduced for the two modulations applied is discussed, and alsoÂ the Q factor introduced using different power values and, in different data rate for the two modulations studied is presented whereÂ we canÂ determine from these results of the Q factor the effect of the power and the limit of applying the direct modulation and the external modulation in terms of the maximum of the data rate that can be transmitted. Moreover, we provide a numerical results of the Q factor and the BER for the two modulations (DM and EM) using RZ and NRZ format codes at different distance transmission, and in different data rate through these results we can conclude in which code (RZ and NRZ) the DM and the EM performed better.
Shiva Kumar and M. Jamal Deen, â€˜fiber optic communications fundamentals and applicationsâ€™chapter.4, 1st edn, edition. John Wiley & Sons, 2014.
Paul O. Idowu1 et al â€œComparative Study of Chirp in Direct and External Optical Modulationâ€ International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology & Security (IJCSITS), Vol.7, No.2, Mar-April 2017.
G. Morthier, B. Moeyersoon â€œImprovement of the Direct Modulation Behavior of Semiconductor Lasers by Using a Holding Beamâ€ IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, Vol. 16, NO. 7, July 2004.
C. E. Rogers III, et al â€œCharacterization and Compensation of the Residual Chirp in a Mach-Zehnder-Type Electro-Optical Intensity Modulatorâ€ Optical Society of America, Mar 2010.
Charles Cox et al â€œTechniques and Performance of Intensity-Modulation Direct-Detection Analog Optical Linksâ€ IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, Vol. 45, No. 8, August 1997.
Hamutal Shalom, and al â€œOn the Various Time Constants of Wavelength Changes of a DFB Laser Under Direct Modulationâ€ IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics, vol. 34, no. 10, october 1998.
P. Krehlik, â€œCharacterization of semiconductor laser frequency chirp based on signal distortion in dispersive optical fiberâ€ Opto-electronics Review 14 (2), 123-128.
Le Nguyen Binh â€œOptical Fiber Communications Systems: Theory and Practice with MATLABÂ® and SimulinkÂ® Modelsâ€ Chapter.5, edited by Taylor & Francis Group, 2015.
Osman WM, Billal KH, Al Nabi AB â€œBit Error Rate Performance for Optical Fiber Systemâ€ J Electr Electron Syst, vol.7, issu.1, 2018.
Christophe Peucheret â€˜Direct and External Modulation of Lightâ€™ 34129 Experimental Course in Optical Communication, 2009.
Stavros Iezekiel, â€œElectrical-to-optical conversion: modulatorsâ€ Lecture 08, 2015.
Jing Niu, Jianqiao Shen , Niu Yubingâ€œA Study on the Effects of Dispersion and Nonlinearity in Optical Fiber Communication Systems using DCFâ€ DOI 10.5013/IJSSST.a.17.33.36.
How to Cite
Copyright of articles that appear in Elektrika belongs exclusively to Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Penerbit UTM Press). This copyright covers the rights to reproduce the article, including reprints, electronic reproductions, or any other reproductions of similar nature.