Comparative study of Multiple Criteria Decision Making methods for selecting the best Demand Side Management options


  • Muhamad Rasydan Mokhtar Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
  • Md Pauzi Abdullah Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
  • Mohammad Yusri Hassan Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
  • Faridah Hussin Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia



This paper presents comparative study of multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) methods for analysing Demand Side Management (DSM) options in improving energy efficiency. The solution of selecting the best DSM options contains of weighting the criteria and ranking the options. A method known as Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) is used to weighting the criteria. Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluation (PROMETHEE), Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) and Weighted Sum Method (WSM) used to rank the DSM options. Combination of AHP with PROMETHEE (AHP-PROMETHEE), AHP with TOPSIS (AHP-TOPSIS) and AHP with WSM (AHP-WSM) have been applied in a case study where 7 DSM options to be evaluated according to 6 criteria. The results shown 3 sets of ranking order where all approaches shown DSM1 is the most cost effective option while DSM5 is the least cost effective option. However there is slightly different in AHP-TOPSIS ranking order between second priority and third priority while AHP-PROMETHEE and AHP-WSM provide same ranking order. In addition, AHP-WSM and AHP-TOPSIS have an advantage over AHP-PROMETHEE where do not required any pairwise comparison to be completed in ranking process.


W. Abrahamse, L. Steg, C. Vlek and T. Rothengatter, “A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation,†Journal of Environmental Psychology, vol. 25, pp. 273–291, September 2005.

G. Strbac, “Demand side management: Benefits and challenges,†Energy Policy, vol. 36, pp. 4419-4426, December 2008.

C. Lombard, E. H. Mathews and M. Kleingeld, “Demand-Side Management through thermal efficiency in South African houses,†Energy and Buildings, vol. 29, pp. 229–239, January 1999.

P. Finn, M. O’Connell and C. Fitzpatrick, “Demand side management of a domestic dishwasher: Wind energy gains, financial savings and peak-time load reduction,†Applied Energy, vol. 101, pp. 678–685, January 2013.

R. Rankin, P. G. Rousseau and M. van Eldik, “Demand side management for commercial buildings using an inline heat pump water heating methodology,†Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 45, pp. 1553-1563, June 2004.

M. Schweitzer, E. Hirst and L. J. Hill, “Factors Affecting the Choice of Supply-and Demand-Side Programs by Electric Utilities,†Energy Studies Review, vol. 2, pp. 95-107, 1991.

Z. Ma, P. Cooper, D. Daly and L. Ledo, “Existing building retrofits: Methodology and state-of-the-art,†Energy and Buildings, vol. 55, pp. 889-902, December 2012.

G. Geng, Z. Wang, J. Zhao and N. Zhu, “Suitability assessment of building energy saving technologies for office building in cold areas of China based on an assessment framework,†Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 103, pp. 650-664, October 2015.

T. L. Saaty, “How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process,†European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 48, pp. 9-26, September 1990.

M. Behzadian, R. B. Kazemzadeh, A. Albadvi and M. Aghdasi, “PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications,†European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 200, pp. 198-215, January 2010.

J. P. Brans, P. Vincke and B. Mareschal, “How to select and how to rank projects: The PROMETHEE method,†European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 24, pp. 228-238, February 1986.

C. L. Hwang, Y. J. Lai and T. Y. Liu, “A new approach for multiple objective decision making,†Computers and Operations Research, vol. 20, pp. 889-899, October 1993.

J. J. Wang, Y. Y. Jing, C. F. Zhang and J. H. Zhao, “Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making,†Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 13, pp. 2263-2278, December 2009.

P. Blondeau, M. Spérandio and F. Allard, “Multicriteria analysis of ventilation in summer period,†Building and Environment, vol. 37, pp. 165-176, February 2002.

M. Huang and B. Wang, “Evaluating green performance of building products based on gray relational analysis and analytic hierarchy process,†Environmental Progress and Sustainable Energy, vol. 33, pp. 1389-1395, December 2014.

R. MikuÄionienÄ—, V. Martinaitis and E. Keras, “Evaluation of energy efficiency measures sustainability by decision tree method,†Energy and Buildings, vol. 76, pp. 64-71, June 2014.

A. N. Al-enezi, “Demand Side Management for efficient use of energy in the residential sector in Kuwait: Analysis of options and priorities,†Ph.D. dissertation, Institute of Energy and Sustainable Development, De Montfort University, 2010.




How to Cite

Mokhtar, M. R., Abdullah, M. P., Hassan, M. Y., & Hussin, F. (2017). Comparative study of Multiple Criteria Decision Making methods for selecting the best Demand Side Management options. ELEKTRIKA- Journal of Electrical Engineering, 16(1), 11–16.